Siril: Old Data, New Tricks

Siril (https://www.siril.org/) is a (relatively) new freeware program for stacking and processing astronomical images. I've been using it for a couple of months now and although I'm still very much in the learning curve stage, I'm already finding it to be significantly better than its freeware rivals.

Shown below is a crop of an image of Messier 33 (the Triangulum Galaxy), compiled from two hours of data and processed in Siril. Move your cursor over the image to see my previous attempt at processing the same data in DeepSkyStacker (DSS).

 

(The full-size version of this image is available on my Flickr page.) As you can see, the improvement is quite dramatic, particularly in the faint outer spiral arms where a wealth of extra detail is revealed. Siril also does a much better job of preserving the colour information from the original raw files. If you've used DSS to stack raw files you may have noticed that the colours come out very muted (as explained in this informative thread on Cloudy Nights). Prior to using Siril, my workaround was to stack the data again in Sequator (effectively using that as an RGB layer and the DSS output as a luminance layer), which always seemed an unnecessarily convoluted way of going about things considering I'm not a dedicated astro-imager.

So how does it work? Video tutorials and manuals are available online, but here's a quick step-by-step guide (applicable to version 0.9.12) to get you started.

When you install Siril it will create four sub-folders in your Pictures directory, one each for light frames, dark frames, flats and bias frames. Make sure your raw files are in the appropriate folders and from the Siril menu select Scripts > DSLR_preprocessing. (Variant scripts are available if you don't collect darks or flats or some other combination.) You'll need a generous amount of disk space because Siril will create individual fit files for every single raw file - but you can safely delete these once the process is completed (just don't delete your raws!).

A live Output Log window shows the script's progress. It takes between 30 and 60 minutes to run on my laptop (about the same time as DeepSkyStacker).

Upon completion, the script will save a file called result.fit in your Pictures folder. This is the linear 32-bit file (if you've used DeepSkyStacker it's equivalent to the autosave.tif file) and it will look excessively dark because most of the useful data is bunched over to the far left of the histogram. At this point I would recommend renaming the result.fit file to something more meaningful and keeping it somewhere safe, just in case you later find you've overcooked your histogram-stretching and want to have another crack at it.

The image will require a bit of work before it's ready for processing in Photoshop or whatever your preferred image editor is. Fortunately Siril has all the tools you need under the Image Processing menu.

First, change the Display Mode dropdown at the bottom of the image screen from Linear to AutoStretch or Histogram to get a better sense of the quality of your data. The Histogram display mode (like Equalize in Photoshop) is useful for showing the dark boundaries caused by tracking drift over the course of the imaging session. Draw a box on the image to exclude these dark areas and then right-click and select Crop. (You can always carry out a more precise crop later on in Photoshop.)

Siril image window in AutoStretch display mode

The Histogram preview will also show if there's a light pollution gradient in your image. Remove this by selecting Image Processing > Background Extraction. You can select background samples manually or click on the Generate button to have Siril select them automatically. Then click Apply to correct the image.

Change the display mode back to AutoStretch. The RGB image will now likely have a strong green tint. Remove this by selecting Image Processing > Remove Green Noise... and click on Apply.

Any remaining colour bias can be corrected by selecting Image Processing > Colour Calibration > Colour Calibration. Here you'll need to select an empty part of the background before clicking on Use Current Selection and then Background Neutralisation. Then repeat the process for the White Reference section (this time drawing a box around the brightest part of the image).

Now you're ready to begin stretching the image. Change the preview mode back to Linear and select Image Processing > Histogram Transformation. You may have to magnify the histogram to see where the data is. Drag the Midtones slider to the left and the Shadows slider to the right (making sure you don't clip your data). Click on Apply to apply the transformation. As you're probably aware, histogram stretching is an iterative process and will need to be repeated several times to get the desired result. (Hopefully the preview display modes will have given you an idea of where the data ends in your image and where the noise begins.) For images with complex dynamic ranges (such as the Orion Nebula) you may have to create two separate stretched images (one for the core and one for the fainter outer regions, and carefully layer them together in Photoshop).

Siril histogram window

Other functions on the image processing menu which may be useful at this stage include Colour Saturation (for boosting the colour), Median Filter (for reducing noise), and Deconvolution (for sharpening) - although the latter does take a long time to run. Otherwise, you can export the image as a 16-bit TIF by selecting File > Save as... ready for finishing off in Photoshop or your image editor of choice.

Here's one more example, showing Messier 27 (the Dumbbell Nebula) in Vulpecula. Again, move your cursor over the image to see the original (DSS) version.

 

(A larger crop of this image is available on my Flickr page.) Detail-wise, the differences are subtle (because M27 is one of the brighter DSOs), but look closer and you'll see that the fainter outer regions of the nebula stand out more clearly in the Siril version. I also prefer the rich blue colour in the newer version. Which one do you prefer?

Meet the Galactic Neighbours

What's the most distant object you can see with the naked eye? Unless you live near a dark-sky site (and have exceptional eyesight) the answer is most likely the Andromeda Galaxy. To find it, go outside on a clear, moonless autumn evening and allow a few minutes for your eyes to adjust to the dark. The Andromeda Galaxy is located about midway between the square of Pegasus and the "W" of Cassiopeia.

You should be able to see a faint smudge of light that increases in size when you look slightly to one side of it. (If you're not sure you're looking in the right place, use a pair of binoculars and you should spot it straight away.) That faint smudge of light takes on new meaning when you consider it's a vast complex of stars and dust and gas 220,000 light years across and 2.5 million light years away. It's also barrelling towards us at 110 kilometres per second, so if you hang around a few billion years it's going to get a whole lot bigger and brighter.

In the meantime we'll have to make do with views like the one below. This is an image I made from an hour's worth of exposures using a Canon 80D DSLR and a Tele Vue-60 refractor (focal length approximately 400 mm):

Telescopically, M31 is impressive whatever instrument you point at it, but picking out the kind of detail shown in the photo above is more of a challenge than you might think. On a good night I can see the two dark dust lanes northwest of the core region, and also a vague suggestion of clumpiness in the spiral arms, particularly around the star cloud NGC 206. The two companion galaxies, M32 and the fainter M110, are also easy to spot.

Andromeda and our own Milky Way are the two largest members of the Local Group - a modest collection of at least 50 (mostly dwarf) galaxies occupying a region of space 10 million light years across. Roughly 14 degrees south of M31 is the third largest member of the Local Group, M33 (aka the Triangulum Galaxy). Here's an image I took at the end of August, using the same camera/telescope combination, this time assembled from two hours of data.

Although M33 is only little further away (relatively speaking) than M31 at 2.73 million light years it has a very low surface brightness - and is consequently much harder to see. It's also very sensitive to light pollution. Oddly enough I always found this galaxy easier to spot in a pair of 7x50 binoculars than in my 4-inch refractor. Even on a good night it was vanishingly faint.

In the 10-inch Dobsonian it appears as an extended misty patch of light with a tiny star-like nucleus. On a favourable night I can just about make out the two main spiral arms (the northern one is brighter and easier than the southern one). Higher magnification reveals a prominent misty spot 13 arcminutes northeast of the nucleus (visible as a blue blob in the image above), lurking close to an 11th magnitude foreground star. This is NGC 604, one of the largest star forming regions in the Local Group. It's a whopping 1,500 light years across, which is roughly the distance between here and the Orion Nebula.

Both M31 and M33 have been extensively studied by astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope and, as you might expect, the images are spectacular:

Hubble's high-definition panoramic view of the Andromeda Galaxy
Triangulum Galaxy shows stunning face in detailed Hubble portrait

Into the Whirlpool

Ask someone to draw you a galaxy and chances are they'll come back with a spiral shape. Even a small telescope will show you plenty of galaxies (if you know where to look), but how large a scope do you need to see those dramatic spirals? Edge-on galaxies like M82 and NGC 4565 show lots of detail in modest-sized scopes because their light is concentrated into a smaller area, but the majority of face-on galaxies have such a low surface brightness that the slightest haze or encroaching light pollution can render their spiral arms invisible.

There are a few notable exceptions however, and for northern hemisphere observers, the consensus seems to be that Messier 51 (commonly known as the Whirlpool Galaxy) is the best of the bunch. It resides some 25 million light-years away in the constellation of Canes Venatici (the Hunting Dogs), and can be found high overhead on spring evenings near the tail of the Great Bear (Ursa Major).

Here's a photo I took (actually forty-three 90-second exposures, stacked together) in March, showing the spiral very clearly:

M51 & NGC 5195, 28 Mar 2019; Canon EOS 80D + Tele Vue-60 + Vixen Super Polaris

For a larger crop, see the version on my Flickr page.

Sixty-five minutes' worth of sensor data is one thing, but how much of that detail can you actually see with your own eyes? M51 and its interacting companion NGC 5195 are easy enough to spot through even a small scope, but it wasn't until I got the 10-inch reflector that I was able to see them as more than a pair of faint fuzzy blobs. Even then, the detail was elusive, with the dark spaces between the Whirlpool's arms often more apparent than the arms themselves.

My sketching skills are very rusty so it took me three attempts before I got something I was happy with, but here's an approximation of what M51 looks like through a medium-sized scope on a good night:

For this I used the 10-inch Orion XT10 and a Tele Vue Nagler 9mm eyepiece, giving a magnification of 133x.

Depending on the quality of your night sky, you may be able to see M51's spiral with a smaller telescope. I was never able to make it out with my 4-inch refractor (although the two galaxies themselves were obvious), and even with the XT10 I can't always see it, as demonstrated by these excerpts from my observing notes:

19 May 2018 (first night out with the new scope; sky a little hazy)
Not well placed (wrong side of meridian), but both galaxies showed bright cores. Strong hint of spiral arm structure, and a star superimposed over the face of the galaxy (not a supernova!).

10 February 2019 (cold, but not freezing; sky transparency improved considerably once the crescent moon got out of the way)
In a night of highlights, M51 was the undoubted stand-out. After staring at it for a couple of minutes I suddenly realised I could see the spiral arms quite clearly, defined by the dark space separating them. One arm curling out from core region around a foreground star. A magnificent sight at 133x, even though it was still some way from the zenith. With averted vision it started to look like a ghostly monochrome photo.

31 March 2019 (slightly chilly, windy with occasional strong gusts; transparency good, but not up to the standard set on 10 Feb)
Tonight M51 and NGC 5195 had an almost ghostly aspect about them; the spiral arms seemed to fade in and out of existence independently of averted vision. The view wasn’t substantially improved at 240x, other than highlighting some of the brighter areas with a milky glow. 

4 April 2019 (chilly, gusty evening; excellent seeing, transparency improving as night went on)
Best view of spiral structure since 10 Feb; showed particularly well in averted vision. Dark areas between arms just about visible in direct vision. Also found a faint, round little galaxy roughly south of M51 – not plotted in the Pocket Sky Atlas, but later identified as NGC 5198.

(If you're into this sort of thing and you want to read more of my observing notes, I'm in the process of putting them online at https://mskastro.blogspot.com/ )

The visibility of the spiral is very sensitive to sky conditions, so if you don't succeed on one night, try again on another (and make sure your eyes are fully dark-adapted). Patience and persistence are vital. And here's another tip: if M51's spiral still seems maddeningly faint, steer your scope to the other side of the Great Bear's tail and see what you make of the larger (and fainter) spiral galaxy M101. Trust me, when you return to M51 it will seem positively bright by comparison.

So now you have an idea of what it takes to see the spiral in M51, but what about resolving individual stars in this beautiful galaxy? For that I recommend taking a very deep dive into this image by the Hubble Space Telescope...

See also:
Cosmic Challenge: M51's Spiral Arms - Phil Harrington (Cloudy Nights)